Find financial advisors in Albany, New York ready to help with your financial planning needs so you can enjoy life more with less money stress.

Whether you have lived in Albany for years or recently moved to town, you may need help finding the right financial advisor in the community best suited for your individual needs.

It’s important to first consider your own financial planning priorities before choosing an advisor. Here are a few quick tips to help you get started along with financial advisors in Albany featured on Wealthtender you may want to add to your shortlist.

As you prepare to interview financial advisors in Albany who may be right for you, get to know local financial advisors featured on Wealthtender.

📍 Map: Financial Advisors with their Primary Office Location in Albany

Double-click (or pinch the map on mobile devices) to zoom in and expand the details for financial advisors whose primary office location is in Albany.

📍Double-click or pinch pins to view more.

Showing

The Benefits of Hiring a Financial Advisor in Albany

Hiring a financial advisor can be a great move to help you build a long-term investing strategy. Advisors can help you build an investment portfolio to meet your financial goals and help you plan appropriately for retirement.

As a resident living in Albany, hiring a financial advisor who lives nearby and understands the local economy, cost of living, and regional employers can be quite valuable, especially if your individual circumstances are deeply tied to such factors.

Do you work for one of the largest employers in Albany? If so, there’s a good chance the local financial advisor you hire will also have other clients who work there. This knowledge could prove valuable if they are already familiar with your employee benefits, such as a 401(k) plan, Health Savings Accounts, and other components of your total compensation package.

When you reach out to financial advisors you’re considering hiring, let them know where you work and ask if they are familiar with your employer’s unique benefits and compensation structure.

Quick Tips For Hiring an Albany Financial Advisor

Before hiring a financial advisor in Albany, here are a few quick tips to help you find the best advisor for you.

1. Decide Which Services You Need

Before hiring an advisor, determine what services you need from them. Whether it’s full-service investment management or a plan focused on a specific area of your finances, put together a list of what you’d like help with before contacting an advisor.

Though most people use a financial planner simply to invest for retirement, this is only a small part of what many advisors offer. Here’s a quick rundown of potential services a financial advisor may offer you:

  • Budgeting and money management
  • Debt management
  • Insurance planning
  • Retirement planning
  • Other investment planning
  • Inheritance planning
  • Estate planning
  • Tax planning

As you can see, financial advisors can help you with your entire financial picture, not just investing. As you start to plan for life’s bigger milestones, you should consider finding a financial advisor that specializes in those areas.

Finding the right advisor can help you minimize risk, maximize gains and take advantage of tax breaks while investing for your future. They can also help you protect your assets with the right kinds of insurance and help you pass on your financial legacy with a proper estate plan.

2. Consider Your Budget and Payment Preferences

Once you have a list of services you would like, review the fee structures financial advisors offer. Finding a balance between the services you need and the cost of those services will help narrow down the field of advisors you may want to work with.

If you are looking for a full-service advisor to manage all of your investments, consider searching among fee-based financial advisors. If you want to manage your money yourself, consider the flat fee and monthly subscription advisors for ongoing support.

3. Interview Multiple Financial Advisors

Once you have chosen the services and fee structure you prefer, it’s time to contact a few advisors and interview them. Here are questions to ask financial advisors:

  • What services do you provide?
  • What are all the ways you get paid? (fee transparency)
  • What is your investment strategy?
  • How do you measure investment performance?
  • How do we communicate about my plan?

Interview multiple advisors to get a feel for who you want to work with. A combination of fees, services, and customer service will help you determine the best fit for your financial advice.

4. Review Financial Advisor Credentials

Once you find an advisor (or two) you feel comfortable with, it’s always a good practice to check their credentials and the firm’s details. You can do this at the Investment Adviser Public Disclosure (IAPD) website

You can check both the individual and the firm to view their background and experience details, as well as any disciplinary action taken against them or their firm.

As licensed financial professionals, there is oversight into how financial advisors conduct business, so running a quick (free) check on them is recommended.

For additional information about advisor credentials, read our article to learn the most popular designations held by financial advisors, as well as specialized credentials which may be important to consider if you have unique financial planning needs.


Frequently Asked Questions & Additional Resources

How do I know if I’m ready to hire a financial advisor?

You should strongly consider hiring a financial advisor if you have a significant amount of money available for saving or investing. This could occur after years of making annual contributions to a retirement plan like a 401(k) through your employer or suddenly if you receive a large inheritance or sell your house for a large profit.

But even if you don’t have a lot of money saved, many financial advisors and planners provide reasonable pricing options and valuable services you should consider, especially if you’re facing a significant life event. For example, if you’re starting a new job, getting married, starting a family, getting divorced, lost your job, starting or selling a business, or approaching retirement age, working with a trusted financial advisor or planner may prove worthwhile.

Before I hire a new financial advisor, should I fire my current advisor?

You don’t need to fire your current advisor before beginning your search for a new financial advisor. In fact, your new advisor can help coordinate the transition of your assets from your previous financial advisor.

Where can I read reviews about financial advisors written by their clients to help me decide if I should hire them?

After 60 years of regulatory prohibition of financial advisor reviews in the US, a rule issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) became effective on May 4, 2021 that means both financial advisors and directory websites that help consumers search for a financial advisor can collect and display financial advisor reviews, an important factor worth considering when choosing who you’ll hire to manage your investments and life savings. 

Wealthtender is the first independent advisor review platform designed to be fully compliant with the new SEC rule, and we look forward to helping you evaluate financial advisors based on reviews written by their clients.

I’m a local financial advisor interested in being featured in this guide. How do I get started?

Thanks for your interest. We look forward to learning more about your practice and helping you attract your ideal clients where you may be a good fit based on their individual needs and circumstances. Please click here to learn how you can join local financial advisors featured on Wealthtender.

How Much Does a Financial Advisor Cost?

➡️ How Much Does a Financial Advisor Cost? Read the Article

About the Author
A headshot of Brian Thorp, the founder and CEO of Wealthtender

About the Author

Brian Thorp

Brian is CEO and founder of Wealthtender and Editor-in-Chief. He and his wife live in Austin, Texas. With over 25 years in the financial services industry, Brian is applying his experience and passion at Wealthtender to help more people enjoy life with less money stress. Learn More about Brian

January 14, 2026

For many high earners, especially those with additional income streams, the bigger challenge is finding ways to continue saving beyond these limits in a tax-efficient way.

At the same time, it’s becoming increasingly more common for full-time employees to earn income outside their primary job. If you offer freelancing or consulting services, or maybe you’re turning your favorite hobby into an income source, you may need an LLC. This is especially true for 1099 contractors who earn meaningful self-employment income alongside a W-2 job. Not only can an LLC provide critical legal protections for business owners, but it also allows sole proprietors and their spouses to access additional retirement savings opportunities—as long as certain conditions are met.

One of the most compelling benefits is the ability to make post-tax contributions and convert them to Roth within a properly structured Solo 401(k), potentially creating a powerful source of tax-free retirement income.

Here’s why it may be worth establishing a separate retirement account, called a Solo 401(k), under your LLC.

What Is a Solo 401(k)?

A Solo 401(k) is a retirement plan, similar to a traditional 401(k), that’s designed specifically for self-employed individuals or business owners with no full-time employees (other than a spouse). This includes business owners and 1099 contractors who earn self-employment income, even if they also participate in an employer-sponsored retirement plan through a W-2 job. To be eligible to open and contribute to a Solo 401(k) under your LLC, you must earn income. 

A Solo 401(k) can be an especially advantageous offering for solopreneurs since it enables you to contribute as both the employee and the employer. As the employee, you can make contributions up to the annual limit. As the employer, your business can make additional profit-sharing contributions, subject to IRS limits tied to income and compensation.

Importantly, you can own and contribute to both a traditional 401(k) and a Solo 401(k), but both are subject to the same annual contribution limit—meaning your combined pre-tax contributions to both accounts cannot exceed $24,500 in 2026. However, this limit applies only to employee deferrals, not total contributions.

Solo 401(k) Strategies

While they can certainly work in tandem, each plan may serve a slightly different purpose within your retirement savings strategy. Your traditional plan can help you capture benefits tied to your employment, including employer matching, while your Solo 401(k) allows your business income to fund its own retirement strategy, often with more flexibility and higher overall contribution potential. For many high-income business owners and 1099 earners, that flexibility is what makes advanced Roth strategies possible.

Here are a few ways to leverage a Solo 401(k) alongside your traditional plan.

Hire Your Spouse

If your spouse can contribute to the business in a legitimate, documented role, paying them a reasonable wage is one way to increase access to tax-advantaged retirement savings. As an employee of the LLC, your spouse may be eligible to contribute to the Solo 401(k) up to the annual employee deferral limit. The business can also make employer contributions on their behalf.

By including your spouse as an employee, you may be able to meaningfully increase household retirement savings while keeping your business income within the family.

Optimize Your Employer Matching

Most employers who offer 401(k)s to employees will include contribution matching to incentivize participation. Often, the matching contributions are limited to a certain percentage or dollar amount, say 3% of the employee’s salary.

If you or your spouse receives an employer match through a W-2 job, continue contributing up to the matching limit. This is essentially free money from your employer, which can compound greatly between now and retirement.

Once you reach the employer matching limit, consider then focusing your contributions on your Solo 401(k) instead. You can direct additional employee deferrals into the Solo 401(k) and layer in employer contributions from your business, essentially achieving tax-deferral benefits from both plans.

Customize Your Investment Options

Employer 401(k)s are often limited to a few predetermined funds or strategies, often target-date mutual funds. They’re trying to find the most generally beneficial solution for a wide range of people. With a Solo 401(k), however, you have the flexibility and control to create a tailored investment lineup that fits your investment needs, comfort level with risk, and timeline towards retirement. Depending on the custodian and structure, you may have access to a much broader investment universe, including ETFs, private investments, and alternative strategies.

Create Potential Tax-Free Retirement Income with Roth Conversions

Certain 401(k) plan structures allow participants to make post-tax contributions, which can be converted into Roth accounts through a Roth conversion or mega backdoor Roth conversion. Over time, this can help build a pool of tax-free retirement assets alongside traditional, tax-deferred savings. This is one of the most powerful planning opportunities available to high-income business owners and 1099 contractors.

When designed correctly, a Solo 401(k) may allow you to contribute beyond standard pre-tax limits by making post-tax contributions and converting them to a Roth. The maximum allowable contribution to a 401(k) is $72,000 in 2026. This includes both employee and employer contributions and may also include post-tax contributions depending on plan design.

Roth conversions can be technically complex and often require certain stipulations or criteria to be effective. Check with your advisor and plan provider first before pursuing a conversion.

Making the Most of Your 401(k) in 2026 and Beyond

If you tend to meet the maximum contribution limits on your workplace retirement plan before the year is over, a Solo 401(k) through your LLC could offer additional planning opportunities. This can be especially valuable for 1099 contractors and business owners who want greater control over how and where they save for retirement. If you’re considering opening and contributing to a new plan, speak with a financial advisor first. Our team at Envision can help you understand the contribution rules, investment options, tax considerations, and more. Schedule a call to get started.

Sources:

  1. https://www.irs.gov/newsroom/401k-limit-increases-to-24500-for-2026-ira-limit-increases-to-7500

This article was originally published here and is republished on Wealthtender with permission.

Headshot of Sean Gerlin, CFP®, CPWA®, ChFC®, CLU®
Sean Gerlin, CFP®, CPWA®, ChFC®, CLU® Creating Clarity Out Of Complexity

Sean Gerlin, CFP®, CPWA®, ChFC®, CLU® | Envision Wealth Planners

Looking for financial advice can be confusing and overwhelming. But it doesn’t have to be. The financial industry uses ambiguous and overlapping terms, but what do they really mean?

If you’re like most people, you just need an honest answer to tough financial questions. Yet, when you start looking for help, you’re met with a variety of terms like adviser, advicer, manager, and planner – all with the words financial, wealth, fiduciary, and investment added to spice things up.

It feels like a bad Wizard of Oz parody, “Advisors and Managers and Planners. Oh, my!” So, let’s pull back the curtain and see what these terms mean, the real differences, and who you actually need to work with.

Why These Titles Are So Confusing

Part of the confusion stems from marketing, and part from regulation. Financial professionals want to highlight their expertise and customize their titles to attract potential clients. State and Federal regulators, like FINRA and the SEC, want to ensure consumers get what they pay for.

The title itself doesn’t matter as much as legal registration and professional designations. The first thing you need to check to see if a financial planner is “legit” is if they’re registered. You can check on the FINRA BrokerCheck site or the SEC Investment Adviser Public Disclosure website (both link to each other).

What Does Registration as an Adviser Mean

Just because someone is registered doesn’t mean they have a ton of expertise or knowledge. Being registered simply means the advisor has passed a test about investments and what they can legally do as an adviser. They also have to pass a background check.

What Are “Series” Licenses?

You’ll often see licenses with terms like Series 7, Series 65, etc. FINRA administers several securities exams. Each of these exams and accompanying licenses is required to trade financial products and/or to receive compensation for providing investment advice.

The Terms Broker, Dealer, and Broker-Dealer

Unfortunately, there are even more legal terms to muddy the waters. The series licenses are typically for people who buy and sell securities. If the advisor holds a Series 6, Series 7, Series 63, or Series 66 license, they can legally sell financial products.

If the person is registered with a broker-dealer, they’ll need these licenses. However, the Series 65 or equivalent designation is required to give advice. In short, if the person holds a Series 6, Series 7, Series 63, or Series 66, they probably have products to sell you and get paid, at least partially, on commission.

They are trained to advise on the purchase of investments and insurance products. Some offer more, but many do not.

What About Credentials and Designations Like the CFP® Marks?

In addition to actual legal licenses, advisors may have designations from one or more organizations. These are governed by the individual organizations or institutions who grant them. Most of these certifications require some form of education, an exam, and continuing education (and fees) to remain in good standing.

FINRA now recognizes hundreds of different professional designations. One of the most commonly sought-after is the CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER® certification, which the CFP Board administers. The founder of NextGen Wealth, Clint Haynes, is a CFP® professional.

The CFP® Designation

To become a CFP® professional, individuals must have a minimum of a bachelor’s degree, complete the minimum financial planning courses (seven total college-level courses), have several thousand hours of experience, and pass a rigorous 6-hour test (65% pass rate). It’s not an easy process.

The “F-Word” – Fiduciary

The best financial advice is fiduciary in nature. A fiduciary simply means the person advising you is required to place your needs above their own and always recommend what’s best for you. Technically, all financial advisors are required to act as fiduciaries.

However, some advisors also wear another hat as a broker-dealer when they sell insurance or investment products. The standards of a broker-dealer are confusing. Someone who is licensed to sell insurance or investment products is supposed to be held to what’s called a “best interest” standard. This is like a fiduciary standard, but not as good.

Conflicts of Interest

All financial transactions have inherent conflicts of interest. Any time there’s an exchange between a person and another person or business, conflicts of interest can happen. By law, advisors and broker-dealers are required to disclose any “material conflicts of interest” when doing business with consumers.

You know all those long documents nobody reads? There are usually disclosures about conflicts of interest in there. However, just telling you they exist doesn’t eliminate them.

One Step Further

Some advisors take it a step further and actively work to eliminate as many conflicts of interest as possible. These advisors are transparent about fees, often don’t sell any investment or insurance products, and make recommendations to benefit the client, even if it means the advisor makes less money.

Common Terms: Advisor, Wealth Manager, Financial Planner

Separate from the legal terms and professional designations, financial professionals call themselves a variety of names. We’ll broadly discuss the more common uses of the terms financial advisor, financial planner, and wealth or investment manager.

What Is a Financial Advisor?

The most common is adviser or advisor, which is also the legal term for someone licensed to give advice for a fee (investment adviser). This term can be spelled either with an “er” or “or,” but they mean the same thing. To be even more confusing, some popular personalities in the financial planning space even use another variation, advicer.

In short, a financial advisor is simply someone who is in the business of providing investment advice. The minimum bar to call yourself an advisor is relatively low. As long as you are registered, you can legally charge for investment advice.

Typical Services Offered

Most advisors will make specific investment recommendations, help set up investment accounts, perform trades and rebalancing for clients, and potentially offer brokerage and trading services. Many will also give guidance on retirement accounts. Many will also sell insurance products such as life insurance and annuities.

How Financial Advisors Are Paid

Historically, most advisors are paid on commissions, advisory fees on assets under management (AUM), or hybrid compensation models. The exact compensation for an advisor will vary depending on whether they’re a solo practitioner, work for a larger firm or broker-dealer,  or work for a Registered Investment Advisor (RIA).

Pros and Cons

The term advisor is very broad and can apply to just about anyone with a license. For advisors who are paid on commission, there are many inherent conflicts of interest. The term advisor doesn’t really tell you what service you’ll receive for the money you pay.

What Is a Wealth Manager or Investment Manager?

In many cases, a Wealth Manager or Investment Manager focuses on High-Net-Worth-Investors (HNWI). They are licensed the same as any other financial advisor (Series licenses), but try to market themselves as having some type of additional investing expertise.

Many who market themselves as wealth managers try to work with families who have $1 million or more in investable assets. They will typically focus more on market performance, overall returns, and accumulating more and more money.

Services Offered by Wealth Managers

Most wealth managers will offer similar services to the broader array of financial advisors, such as ongoing investment management and product recommendations. They may add some specialty offerings such as advanced tax planning strategies, estate planning, and business and succession planning.

They may have a larger team with a dedicated investment analyst (usually a Chartered Financial Analyst® (CFA®), Certified Public Accountant (CPA), and other “back office” staff.

How Wealth Managers Are Paid

Wealth managers may also be compensated in a variety of ways. It’s common to see commission-based compensation, but there is a shift to more ongoing investment management and charging a percentage of assets under management. You may also see some flat-fee models.

What Is a Financial Planner?

The term financial planner is often used for professionals who focus on comprehensive financial planning. They’ll offer a variety of niche specialties with a comprehensive suite of services. Most financial planners create detailed strategies covering retirement, cash flow, taxes, insurance, and estate planning.

Most financial planners use a structured planning process to help their clients stay on track and take a more comprehensive approach.

Common Qualifications

Most CFP® professionals fall into this category. It’s literally in the name of the designation. However, there may be other professionals and designations with similar attitudes toward financial planning.

How Financial Planners Are Paid

Financial planners have the widest variety of fee and compensation models. Many operate as fee-only planners for increased transparency. However, the world of fee-only is still broad. Fee-only models may include:

  • Flat-fee or project-based planning (one-time or ongoing engagements)
  • Hourly or subscription (flat fee per month or quarter)
  • Assets Under Management (AUM)
  • Advice only (no investment management)

Firm Structure and Service Delivery

Many financial planners work in independent Registered Investment Advisor (RIA) arrangements. They may be registered with their state or the SEC. They could work as solo practitioners or as a large team.

Many financial planners will leverage outside professionals to offer a broader range of services such as asset management, tax planning, and estate planning. Some will even offer coaching or long-term care planning services. The services offered will vary by the individual firm.

When a Financial Planner Is Ideal

A financial planner may be best if you’re looking for a long-term relationship, ongoing management, accountability, efficient delegation, and proactive planning support. Many financial planners get most excited about being your lifelong guide into and throughout retirement.

A comparison chart details differences between a financial advisor and a wealth manager versus a financial planner, covering focus, scope, ideal clients, compensation, and service needs. Green and blue color scheme is used.
Image Credit: NextGen Wealth.

Key Differences at a Glance

We’ve done our best to help narrow down these broad categories, but it’s difficult to fit 15,000 different investment advisers into narrow categories. After all, there is a human behind each one of them. We’ll try to narrow it down by “typical” scope of work, typical clients, and fee structures.

Scope of Work

  • Financial Advisor: Focused on investments and insurance.
    • Legal term for financial advisers.
  • Wealth Manager: Focused on complex, high-net-worth individuals.
    • May expand offerings beyond investments and insurance.
  • Financial Planner: Focuses on a more holistic planning approach and complex, personalized strategies.
    • Usually offers specialized advice with a narrow focus on a specific type of client.

Ideal Client Profile

A financial advisor can serve anyone, but will often focus on selling their own products and investment offerings. They may have a minimum level of investment assets to work with them.

Wealth managers are typically focused on high-net-worth individuals. They’re often looking for individuals or families with $1 million or more in investable assets.

Financial planners will offer the broadest range of service models for a wide range of people. They often work with high-earners or high-net-worth individuals.

Fee Structures

  • Financial Advisor: Typically, commission-based or AUM.
    • Could technically offer any number of compensation models.
  • Wealth Manager: Typically, AUM, but could be flat-fee, retainer, or commission-based.
  • Financial Planner: Broadest array of compensation models. May offer:
    • Hourly
    • One-Time Fee
    • Recurring Subscription (typically monthly or quarterly)
    • Advice-Only
    • Fee-Only
    • Flat-Fee
    • AUM
    • Some may still have insurance licenses and/or earn commissions from investments, but this is not as common.

How to Tell What Kind of Professional You’re Working With

The only way to be sure about who and what is behind the financial professional you’re talking to is to look at their regulatory paperwork. Many advisors list their fees and services directly on their websites. If they don’t, you can look up their “Form Adv Part 2A Brochure” or “Part 2 Brochures” document filed with the state (FINRA) or the SEC.

You’ll see a listing of the business structure, fees, types of clients they serve, if they’ve had any complaints or disciplinary actions taken against them, as well as a variety of other information.

Which Professional Is Right for You?

We highly recommend starting your search for a financial professional by thinking through exactly what you need help with.

  • Do you only want investment management?
  • Would you prefer to get financial planning included?
  • Do you want ongoing support throughout retirement?
  • What will you need as you age or have cognitive decline?
  • What about support when one spouse passes away?
  • Do you require tax or estate planning and coordination?
  • Does your asset level necessitate a more specialized service model?

If you’re a do-it-yourself (DIY) investor and just want a second set of eyes and no ongoing support, maybe a one-time engagement is right for you. Or maybe you’ve done a great job as a DIY-er and are ready to delegate those responsibilities so you can spend time enjoying retirement instead.

Questions to Ask Any Financial Professional

Make sure you have a thorough list of questions to ask your potential financial professional. At a minimum, you’ll want to ask:

  • How are you paid?
  • What services do you offer?
  • How often will we meet?
  • How does your service compare to other services?
  • How do you ensure you’re acting as a fiduciary?
  • Do you sell financial products or earn commissions for recommendations?

In many cases, you’ll be paying ongoing fees for service, so it’s essential to know exactly what you’ll get in return. If you don’t feel comfortable, keep asking questions until you do. If you run out of questions and still don’t feel comfortable, follow your gut, and walk away; it’s just not a good fit.

Clarity Leads to Confident Decisions

The landscape of financial professionals can be confusing at best. Understanding the real difference between them will help you choose the right professional for your retirement team. Titles matter a whole lot less than the actual services offered, trust and transparency, and the professional’s fiduciary commitment to you.

This article was originally published here and is republished on Wealthtender with permission.

About the Author

Headshot of Clint Haynes, CFP®
Clint Haynes, CFP® Helping you build a retirement with pleasure, purpose, and peace of mind.

Clint Haynes, CFP® | NextGen Wealth

Find financial advisors in Lehi, Utah ready to help with your financial planning needs so you can enjoy life more with less money stress.

Whether you have lived in Lehi for years or recently moved to town, you may need help finding the right financial advisor in the community best suited for your individual needs.

It’s important to first consider your own financial planning priorities before choosing an advisor. Here are a few quick tips to help you get started along with financial advisors in Lehi featured on Wealthtender you may want to add to your shortlist.

As you prepare to interview financial advisors in Lehi who may be right for you, get to know local financial advisors featured on Wealthtender.

📍 Map: Financial Advisors with their Primary Office Location in Lehi

Double-click (or pinch the map on mobile devices) to zoom in and expand the details for financial advisors whose primary office location is in Lehi.

📍Double-click or pinch pins to view more.

Showing

📍 Additional Advisors Who Serve Clients in Lehi

In addition to the advisors featured above, these advisors can also meet with you in person in Lehi.

The Benefits of Hiring a Financial Advisor in Lehi

Hiring a financial advisor can be a great move to help you build a long-term investing strategy. Advisors can help you build an investment portfolio to meet your financial goals and help you plan appropriately for retirement.

As a resident living in Lehi, hiring a financial advisor who lives nearby and understands the local economy, cost of living, and regional employers can be quite valuable, especially if your individual circumstances are deeply tied to such factors.

Do you work for one of the largest employers in Lehi? If so, there’s a good chance the local financial advisor you hire will also have other clients who work there. This knowledge could prove valuable if they are already familiar with your employee benefits, such as a 401(k) plan, Health Savings Accounts, and other components of your total compensation package.

When you reach out to financial advisors you’re considering hiring, let them know where you work and ask if they are familiar with your employer’s unique benefits and compensation structure.

Quick Tips For Hiring an Lehi Financial Advisor

Before hiring a financial advisor in Lehi, here are a few quick tips to help you find the best advisor for you.

1. Decide Which Services You Need

Before hiring an advisor, determine what services you need from them. Whether it’s full-service investment management or a plan focused on a specific area of your finances, put together a list of what you’d like help with before contacting an advisor.

Though most people use a financial planner simply to invest for retirement, this is only a small part of what many advisors offer. Here’s a quick rundown of potential services a financial advisor may offer you:

  • Budgeting and money management
  • Debt management
  • Insurance planning
  • Retirement planning
  • Other investment planning
  • Inheritance planning
  • Estate planning
  • Tax planning

As you can see, financial advisors can help you with your entire financial picture, not just investing. As you start to plan for life’s bigger milestones, you should consider finding a financial advisor that specializes in those areas.

Finding the right advisor can help you minimize risk, maximize gains and take advantage of tax breaks while investing for your future. They can also help you protect your assets with the right kinds of insurance and help you pass on your financial legacy with a proper estate plan.

2. Consider Your Budget and Payment Preferences

Once you have a list of services you would like, review the fee structures financial advisors offer. Finding a balance between the services you need and the cost of those services will help narrow down the field of advisors you may want to work with.

If you are looking for a full-service advisor to manage all of your investments, consider searching among fee-based financial advisors. If you want to manage your money yourself, consider the flat fee and monthly subscription advisors for ongoing support.

3. Interview Multiple Financial Advisors

Once you have chosen the services and fee structure you prefer, it’s time to contact a few advisors and interview them. Here are questions to ask financial advisors:

  • What services do you provide?
  • What are all the ways you get paid? (fee transparency)
  • What is your investment strategy?
  • How do you measure investment performance?
  • How do we communicate about my plan?

Interview multiple advisors to get a feel for who you want to work with. A combination of fees, services, and customer service will help you determine the best fit for your financial advice.

4. Review Financial Advisor Credentials

Once you find an advisor (or two) you feel comfortable with, it’s always a good practice to check their credentials and the firm’s details. You can do this at the Investment Adviser Public Disclosure (IAPD) website

You can check both the individual and the firm to view their background and experience details, as well as any disciplinary action taken against them or their firm.

As licensed financial professionals, there is oversight into how financial advisors conduct business, so running a quick (free) check on them is recommended.

For additional information about advisor credentials, read our article to learn the most popular designations held by financial advisors, as well as specialized credentials which may be important to consider if you have unique financial planning needs.


Frequently Asked Questions & Additional Resources

How do I know if I’m ready to hire a financial advisor?

You should strongly consider hiring a financial advisor if you have a significant amount of money available for saving or investing. This could occur after years of making annual contributions to a retirement plan like a 401(k) through your employer or suddenly if you receive a large inheritance or sell your house for a large profit.

But even if you don’t have a lot of money saved, many financial advisors and planners provide reasonable pricing options and valuable services you should consider, especially if you’re facing a significant life event. For example, if you’re starting a new job, getting married, starting a family, getting divorced, lost your job, starting or selling a business, or approaching retirement age, working with a trusted financial advisor or planner may prove worthwhile.

Before I hire a new financial advisor, should I fire my current advisor?

You don’t need to fire your current advisor before beginning your search for a new financial advisor. In fact, your new advisor can help coordinate the transition of your assets from your previous financial advisor.

Where can I read reviews about financial advisors written by their clients to help me decide if I should hire them?

After 60 years of regulatory prohibition of financial advisor reviews in the US, a rule issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) became effective on May 4, 2021 that means both financial advisors and directory websites that help consumers search for a financial advisor can collect and display financial advisor reviews, an important factor worth considering when choosing who you’ll hire to manage your investments and life savings. 

Wealthtender is the first independent advisor review platform designed to be fully compliant with the new SEC rule, and we look forward to helping you evaluate financial advisors based on reviews written by their clients.

I’m a local financial advisor interested in being featured in this guide. How do I get started?

Thanks for your interest. We look forward to learning more about your practice and helping you attract your ideal clients where you may be a good fit based on their individual needs and circumstances. Please click here to learn how you can join local financial advisors featured on Wealthtender.

How Much Does a Financial Advisor Cost?

➡️ How Much Does a Financial Advisor Cost? Read the Article

About the Author
A headshot of Brian Thorp, the founder and CEO of Wealthtender

About the Author

Brian Thorp

Brian is CEO and founder of Wealthtender and Editor-in-Chief. He and his wife live in Austin, Texas. With over 25 years in the financial services industry, Brian is applying his experience and passion at Wealthtender to help more people enjoy life with less money stress. Learn More about Brian

Discover financial advisors trusted by Austinites in the only local directory featuring 5-Star Certified Advisor Review recipients and Wealthtender Voice of the Client Award™ winners—recognition earned for exceptional client feedback. Compare fiduciary, fee-only advisors, CFP® professionals, and specialists to find the right fit for your unique financial needs.

Thousands of people visit Wealthtender each month to find and compare financial advisors based on their location, education, experience, areas of specialization and online reviews. Wealthtender’s Certified Advisor Reviews™ help consumers make informed hiring decisions with important details about the relationship between reviewers and advisors always displayed to ensure you gain the transparency you deserve when your life savings could be at stake.

Types of Financial Advisors You’ll Find on Wealthtender

On Wealthtender, you can explore a diverse range of financial advisors and wealth management firms that include:

  • Fiduciary advisors committed to acting in clients’ best interests
  • CFP® professionals with advanced financial planning credentials
  • Fee-only advisors compensated solely by clients
  • Advisors for growing families, people nearing retirement, and business owners
  • Specialists across multiple categories (e.g., life stage, occupation, ethnicity, lifestyle, religion)
  • Highly-rated advisors with positive client reviews
  • Firms of varying sizes with advisors who can meet with you in person or online
  • Fee-based advisors who offer access to insurance and alternative investments

Financial Advisor Directory for Austin, Texas

How to use this directory: Compare financial advisors in the Austin area based on what matters most to you. Use the directory to:

  • View advisor profiles to evaluate credentials, services, and areas of specialization
  • Read Certified Advisor Reviews™ to learn what clients value most
  • Identify advisors recognized with Wealthtender Voice of the Client Awards™
  • Contact advisors and schedule free introductory video calls

📍 Map: Financial Advisors with their Primary Office Location in Austin

Double-click (or pinch the map on mobile devices) to zoom in and expand the details for financial advisors whose primary office location is in Austin.

📍Double-click or pinch pins to view more.

Showing

Wealthtender Voice of the Client Awards™: Top Rated Austin Financial Advisors

Wealthtender Voice of the Client Awards™ recognize financial advisors and firms that consistently earn exceptional client feedback. Below are Austin-area advisors and firms that have met the criteria for Highly Rated recognition.

Firm/Advisor Firm City State Voice of the Client Award Website
Kelly Klingaman, CFP®, RLP® Kelly Klingaman Financial Planning Austin Texas 2026 Highly Rated Advisor Website
Archer Investment Management Archer Investment Management Austin Texas 2025 Highly Rated Firm Website
Richard J. Archer, CDAA, CFA, CFP®, MBA Archer Investment Management Austin Texas 2025 Highly Rated Advisor Website

To qualify for a Highly Rated award, advisors and firms must achieve an average client review rating of 4.75 or higher (on a scale of 1 to 5) based on a minimum number of eligible client reviews published on Wealthtender within a defined timeframe for each particular award (Timeframe for 2025 Award: 1/1/24 – 12/31/25; Timeframe for Subsequent Year Awards: July 1 of the preceding year through December 31 of the Award Year (e.g., Timeframe for 2026 Award 7/1/25 – 12/31/26). Eligible reviews are limited to clients (as of the review submission date) that advisors/firms must self-attest have no material conflicts of interest and received no compensation in exchange for their reviews. ↗️ View full award methodology & FAQs

Although financial advisors and wealth management firms compensate Wealthtender for marketing services (including eligibility to be considered for awards), Wealthtender’s award criteria is objective and not influenced by compensation. Wealthtender Voice of the Client Awards are not a guarantee of future performance or success and client reviews may not be representative of the experience of all past or future clients.

Frequently Asked Questions

What makes a financial advisor “trusted”?
A trusted financial advisor typically earns positive client feedback over time, operates transparently, and clearly explains how they’re compensated. On Wealthtender, trust is reflected through Certified Advisor Reviews™ that combine insights into the client experience and character of advisors with important disclosures about each reviewer to ensure you gain the transparency you deserve when your life savings could be at stake.

Financial advisors and wealth management firms that consistently receive superior client reviews can also qualify for Wealthtender’s Voice of the Client Awards™ designed to recognize America’s most trusted advisors. Learn More About Wealthtender Voice of the Client Awards™
What are Certified Advisor Reviews™?
Certified Advisor Reviews™ from Wealthtender help consumers make smarter hiring decisions when choosing a financial advisor.

Clients and other individuals can submit reviews for financial advisors and wealth management firms that have turned on the reviews feature. Before each review is publicly displayed, financial advisors agree to disclose important information about their relationship with the reviewer to ensure consumers gain the transparency they deserve when their life savings could be at stake. These disclosures also help financial advisors satisfy compliance with industry regulations.

After financial advisors provide the required disclosures, Wealthtender publishes the review with the Certified Advisor Review™ mark. Learn More About Certified Advisor Reviews™
Can I find fiduciary financial advisors on Wealthtender?
Yes, you’ll find hundreds of fiduciary financial advisors on Wealthtender. Fiduciary financial advisors must act in their clients’ best interest. Before hiring an advisor, always ask if they will act in your best interest as a fiduciary.

For example, financial advisors who have earned their Certified Financial Planner (CFP) designation are fiduciaries. To hold themselves out as a CFP, these credential holders must acknowledge they will adhere to the CFP Board’s Code of Ethics and Standards of Conduct and act as a fiduciary when providing financial advice to their clients. Learn More About Fiduciary Financial Advisors
Can I find fee-only financial advisors on Wealthtender?
Yes, you’ll find hundreds of fee-only financial advisors on Wealthtender. Fee-only financial advisors are paid directly by their clients. Since they aren’t compensated based on the products and services they recommend (e.g., commissions), their compensation model helps reduce potential conflicts of interest.

When viewing financial advisor profiles on Wealthtender, look for the Compensation Methods section that shows ways each financial advisor can be paid for their services, including if they offer fee-only financial planning services. Learn More About Fee-Only Financial Advisors
What distinguishes Wealthtender Voice of the Client Awards™ from other advisor recognition programs?
Wealthtender’s Voice of the Client Awards™ recognize financial advisors and wealth management firms that consistently receive superior client reviews. Unlike award programs with ranking factors that favor financial institutions with the most assets and the fastest revenue growth, the Wealthtender Voice of the Client Awards provide both local financial advisors who choose to remain small and large wealth management firms with the opportunity to be recognized on a metric that matters more to consumers – actual client feedback reflecting the quality of their experience. Learn More About Voice of the Client Awards™

The Benefits of Hiring a Financial Advisor in Austin

Hiring a financial advisor can be a great move to help you build a long-term investing strategy. Advisors can help you build an investment portfolio to meet your financial goals and help you plan appropriately for retirement.

As a resident living in Austin, hiring a financial advisor who lives nearby and understands the local economy, cost of living, and regional employers can be quite valuable, especially if your individual circumstances are deeply tied to such factors.

Who are the largest employers in Austin?

The Austin Chamber of Commerce ranks the largest employers in Austin as:

  • Apple
  • Ascension Seton
  • Austin Independent School District
  • City of Austin
  • Dell Technologies
  • Federal Government
  • IBM Corp
  • Round Rock Independent School District
  • Samsung Austin Semiconductor
  • St. David’s HealthCare Partnership

Do you work for one of the largest employers in Austin? If so, there’s a good chance the local financial advisor you hire will also have other clients who work there. This knowledge could prove valuable if they are already familiar with your employee benefits, such as a 401(k) plan, Health Savings Accounts, and other components of your total compensation package.

When you reach out to financial advisors you’re considering hiring, let them know where you work and ask if they are familiar with your employer’s unique benefits and compensation structure.

Quick Tips For Hiring an Austin Financial Advisor

Before hiring a financial advisor in Austin , here are a few quick tips to help you find the best advisor for you.

1. Decide Which Services You Need

Before hiring an advisor, determine what services you need from them. Whether it’s full-service investment management or a plan focused on a specific area of your finances, put together a list of what you’d like help with before contacting an advisor.

Though most people use a financial planner simply to invest for retirement, this is only a small part of what many advisors offer. Here’s a quick rundown of potential services a financial advisor may offer you:

  • Budgeting and money management
  • Debt management
  • Insurance planning
  • Retirement planning
  • Other investment planning
  • Inheritance planning
  • Estate planning
  • Tax planning

As you can see, financial advisors can help you with your entire financial picture, not just investing. As you start to plan for life’s bigger milestones, you should consider finding a financial advisor that specializes in those areas.

Finding the right advisor can help you minimize risk, maximize gains and take advantage of tax breaks while investing for your future. They can also help you protect your assets with the right kinds of insurance and help you pass on your financial legacy with a proper estate plan.

2. Consider Your Budget and Payment Preferences

Once you have a list of services you would like, review the fee structures financial advisors offer. Finding a balance between the services you need and the cost of those services will help narrow down the field of advisors you may want to work with.

If you are looking for a full-service advisor to manage all of your investments, consider searching among fee-based financial advisors. If you want to manage your money yourself, consider the flat fee and monthly subscription advisors for ongoing support.

3. Interview Multiple Financial Advisors

Once you have chosen the services and fee structure you prefer, it’s time to contact a few advisors and interview them. Here are questions to ask financial advisors:

  • What services do you provide?
  • What are all the ways you get paid? (fee transparency)
  • What is your investment strategy?
  • How do you measure investment performance?
  • How do we communicate about my plan?

Interview multiple advisors to get a feel for who you want to work with. A combination of fees, services, and customer service will help you determine the best fit for your financial advice.

4. Review Financial Advisor Credentials

Once you find an advisor (or two) you feel comfortable with, it’s always a good practice to check their credentials and the firm’s details. You can do this at the Investment Adviser Public Disclosure (IAPD) website

You can check both the individual and the firm to view their background and experience details, as well as any disciplinary action taken against them or their firm.

As licensed financial professionals, there is oversight into how financial advisors conduct business, so running a quick (free) check on them is recommended.

For additional information about advisor credentials, read our article to learn the most popular designations held by financial advisors, as well as specialized credentials which may be important to consider if you have unique financial planning needs.

What Do Financial Advisors Love About Austin?

We invited financial advisors in the Wealthtender community to share their favorite places and things to do in Austin. Here’s what they said.

What does Richard Archer love about Austin?
  • Favorite Local Restaurant: Uchi. It’s a tough call, though, since there are many great Austin restaurants now.
  • Favorite Local Sports Team: The Longhorns.  You’ll also find me regularly cheering my other favorite team Liverpool.
  • Favorite Family Activity: Weekend wake and foil surfing on Ladybird Lake
  • Favorite Local Attraction:  The Alamo Drafthouse.  I love movies and their creative preview content
  • Favorite Place to Show Out of Town Guests:  Tiny Boxwoods Milk & Cookies.  Their bakery and coffee are simply amazing. 

Frequently Asked Questions & Additional Resources

How do I know if I’m ready to hire a financial advisor?

You should strongly consider hiring a financial advisor if you have a significant amount of money available for saving or investing. This could occur after years of making annual contributions to a retirement plan like a 401(k) through your employer or suddenly if you receive a large inheritance or sell your house for a large profit.

But even if you don’t have a lot of money saved, many financial advisors and planners provide reasonable pricing options and valuable services you should consider, especially if you’re facing a significant life event. For example, if you’re starting a new job, getting married, starting a family, getting divorced, lost your job, starting or selling a business, or approaching retirement age, working with a trusted financial advisor or planner may prove worthwhile.

Before I hire a new financial advisor, should I fire my current advisor?

You don’t need to fire your current advisor before beginning your search for a new financial advisor. In fact, your new advisor can help coordinate the transition of your assets from your previous financial advisor.

Where can I read reviews about financial advisors written by their clients to help me decide if I should hire them?

After 60 years of regulatory prohibition of financial advisor reviews in the US, a rule issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) became effective on May 4, 2021 that means both financial advisors and directory websites that help consumers search for a financial advisor can collect and display financial advisor reviews, an important factor worth considering when choosing who you’ll hire to manage your investments and life savings. 

Wealthtender is the first independent advisor review platform designed to be fully compliant with the new SEC rule, and we look forward to helping you evaluate financial advisors based on reviews written by their clients.

I’m a local financial advisor interested in being featured in this guide. How do I get started?

Thanks for your interest. We look forward to learning more about your practice and helping you attract your ideal clients where you may be a good fit based on their individual needs and circumstances. Please click here to learn how you can join local financial advisors featured on Wealthtender.

How Much Does a Financial Advisor Cost?

➡️ How Much Does a Financial Advisor Cost? Read the Article

About the Author
A headshot of Brian Thorp, the founder and CEO of Wealthtender

About the Author

Brian Thorp

Brian is CEO and founder of Wealthtender and Editor-in-Chief. He and his wife live in Austin, Texas. With over 25 years in the financial services industry, Brian is applying his experience and passion at Wealthtender to help more people enjoy life with less money stress. Learn More about Brian

One of the most important financial decisions you’ll make in your 60s is when to claim Social Security. Claim at 62 and you’ll receive benefits for more years, but at a permanently reduced amount. Wait until 70 and you’ll receive 77% more per month for the rest of your life.

The math seems straightforward, but the emotional reality is harder. Watching your savings decline while you wait for a larger benefit feels uncomfortable. Many people claim early simply because they can’t stomach drawing down their retirement accounts.

There’s a better approach. The Social Security bridge strategy uses your retirement savings strategically during your 60s to fund a delay in claiming benefits. For many retirees, especially those who live into their 80s and beyond, this strategy can add hundreds of thousands of dollars to lifetime income.

At MJT & Associates, we help clients model this decision carefully, accounting for taxes, other income sources, and individual circumstances. Here’s how the bridge strategy works and when it makes sense for your situation.

Understanding Social Security’s Claiming Rules

Before diving into the bridge strategy, you need to understand how Social Security benefit amounts change based on when you claim.

You can start claiming Social Security retirement benefits as early as age 62. However, claiming before your full retirement age results in permanently reduced benefits. Your full retirement age depends on your birth year. For most people currently approaching retirement, it’s between 66 and 67.

If you were born in 1960 or later, your full retirement age is 67. Claiming at 62 means accepting a 30% permanent reduction in your monthly benefit. That reduction lasts for your entire retirement, not just until you reach full retirement age.

The real opportunity comes from delaying benefits past full retirement age. For each year you delay claiming between full retirement age and 70, your benefit increases by 8% per year. These are called delayed retirement credits. If your full retirement age is 67 and you wait until 70, your monthly benefit will be 24% higher than your full retirement age amount.

Combined with the reduction for claiming early, the difference between claiming at 62 versus 70 is dramatic. A person entitled to $3,000 per month at age 67 would receive only $2,100 at 62, but $3,720 at 70. That’s a 77% difference in monthly income.

The question becomes: is it worth depleting your savings to access that higher benefit?

What Is the Social Security Bridge Strategy?

The bridge strategy is straightforward in concept. Rather than claiming Social Security early because you need the income, you draw more heavily from your retirement savings during your 60s. This “bridges” the gap between when you stop working and when you claim Social Security at 70.

Here’s how it works in practice. Suppose you retire at 62 with $800,000 in retirement savings. Your Social Security benefit would be $2,100 per month if claimed immediately, or $3,720 if you wait until 70. You need $5,000 per month to cover your living expenses.

Under the traditional approach, you might claim Social Security at 62, getting $2,100 per month, and withdraw the remaining $2,900 monthly from your retirement accounts. That’s $34,800 per year from your savings.

Under the bridge strategy, you delay claiming Social Security and withdraw the full $5,000 monthly from your retirement accounts during your 60s. That’s $60,000 per year from savings. Yes, you’re drawing down your accounts more quickly in the short term. But at age 70, your Social Security benefit starts at $3,720 per month instead of $2,100. That extra $1,620 per month continues for the rest of your life.

The higher Social Security benefit means you withdraw less from your retirement accounts after age 70. Over a typical retirement lasting into your 80s or 90s, research shows you’ll usually end up with more assets using the bridge strategy than claiming early, assuming you live to average life expectancy or beyond.

The bridge strategy essentially trades short-term account depletion for long-term income security.

The Math Behind the Bridge Strategy

Understanding the numbers helps clarify why this strategy often makes financial sense.

Let’s use realistic figures. Assume you’re 62 with $1 million in retirement savings. Your Social Security benefit is $2,500 per month at 62 or $4,425 per month at 70. You need $6,000 monthly for expenses.

Scenario 1: Claim at 62

  • Social Security: $2,500/month ($30,000/year)
  • Withdrawal from savings: $3,500/month ($42,000/year)
  • By age 70, you’ve withdrawn approximately $336,000 from savings
  • From 70 onward, you still need $1,500/month from savings ($18,000/year) since Social Security doesn’t cover all expenses

Scenario 2: Bridge Strategy (Claim at 70)

  • Ages 62-70: Withdrawal from savings: $6,000/month ($72,000/year)
  • By age 70, you’ve withdrawn approximately $576,000 from savings
  • At 70, Social Security starts at $4,425/month ($53,100/year)
  • From 70 onward, you need only $1,575/month from savings ($18,900/year)

At first glance, Scenario 1 looks better because you’ve preserved more savings by age 70. But here’s what happens over time.

The key is that Scenario 2 provides $1,925 more per month in Social Security income starting at 70. That’s $23,100 more per year in inflation-adjusted, guaranteed income. If you live to 85, that’s an additional $346,500 in Social Security benefits. Even accounting for the extra $240,000 you withdrew during the bridge period, you come out significantly ahead.

Moreover, because Social Security benefits are taxed more favorably than IRA distributions (at most 85% of Social Security is taxable, and many people pay taxes on much less), the after-tax advantage of the bridge strategy is even more pronounced.

Research from the Bipartisan Policy Center confirms this finding. For people who live to average life expectancy or beyond, using assets to delay Social Security claiming results in more wealth preservation than claiming early.

Tax Advantages of the Bridge Strategy

One often-overlooked benefit of the bridge strategy is the favorable tax treatment.

When you withdraw from traditional IRAs and 401(k)s, every dollar is taxed as ordinary income. If you’re in the 22% federal bracket, a $50,000 withdrawal costs you $11,000 in federal taxes alone.

Social Security benefits receive preferential tax treatment. Depending on your income, anywhere from 0% to 85% of your benefits are taxable. Many retirees pay taxes on only 50% or even 0% of their Social Security income, especially if they manage their other income sources carefully.

This creates a tax arbitrage opportunity. During your bridge years (ages 62-70), you pay full ordinary income tax on larger IRA withdrawals. But starting at 70, you receive much more income from Social Security with better tax treatment and withdraw less from IRAs.

There’s an additional tax planning opportunity here. The bridge years, when you’re taking larger IRA distributions, can be ideal years for Roth conversions. You’re already in a higher tax bracket due to larger withdrawals, and you don’t have Social Security income yet to push you into even higher brackets.

After you start claiming Social Security at 70, your IRA withdrawals drop significantly, potentially moving you to a lower bracket. You’ll be glad you did Roth conversions during the bridge years when your effective tax rate made conversions advantageous.

We explore this strategy in depth in “Is a Roth Conversion Right for You?” and show how coordinating Social Security timing with Roth conversions can save substantial taxes over your lifetime.

When the Bridge Strategy Makes Sense

The bridge strategy isn’t right for everyone. Here are the situations where it makes the most sense.

You’re in good health with family longevity. The bridge strategy pays off when you live long enough to collect the higher benefit for many years. If both your parents lived into their 90s and you’re in excellent health, the strategy becomes very attractive. Life expectancy for someone who reaches 65 is now 84 for men and 87 for women, and many people live considerably longer.

You have adequate retirement savings. You need sufficient assets to fund the bridge period. As a general rule, if you have at least 15 to 20 times your annual expenses in retirement savings (not counting your home), the bridge strategy is feasible. For someone needing $60,000 annually, that means $900,000 to $1.2 million in investable assets.

You’re retiring early or your spouse is younger. If you retire at 55 or 60, you have more years to bridge before claiming at 70. This makes the strategy more complex but potentially more valuable. Similarly, if you have a younger spouse who could be collecting survivor benefits for decades, maximizing your benefit becomes even more important.

You want to maximize survivor benefits. When you die, your spouse receives the higher of their own benefit or your benefit. If you delay claiming and maximize your benefit, you’re also maximizing the survivor benefit your spouse will receive for the rest of their life. This is especially important if you were the higher earner.

You sold a business or received a windfall. For entrepreneurs who recently sold their business, you may have the liquid assets needed to fund a bridge strategy comfortably. The sale proceeds can support your lifestyle while you delay claiming, resulting in significantly higher lifetime income from Social Security.

This scenario is common among our clients, and we address the full range of post-sale financial planning in “The Entrepreneur’s Exit Plan: How to Retire from Your Business on Your Terms.”

When You Should Claim Earlier

There are also clear situations where claiming earlier makes more sense than employing a bridge strategy.

You have serious health issues. If you have a condition that significantly reduces your life expectancy below average, claiming earlier allows you to maximize total benefits received over your shorter retirement. The break-even point for delaying from 62 to 70 is typically somewhere in your late 70s to early 80s. If you’re unlikely to reach that age, claim earlier.

You have insufficient assets for a bridge. If your retirement savings are modest and you need Social Security income to cover basic living expenses, you may not have the luxury of waiting. Claiming at 62 or full retirement age becomes necessary rather than optional.

Your spouse has their own substantial benefit. If both spouses have worked and earned similar amounts, the survivor benefit advantage becomes less important. You might choose to have one spouse claim early while the other delays, creating a diversified claiming strategy.

You face job loss and can’t find work. If you lose your job in your early 60s and despite your best efforts cannot find employment, claiming Social Security may be necessary to bridge the gap to Medicare at 65 and provide essential income.

You’re recently divorced. After divorce, claiming decisions become more complex. You may be eligible for benefits based on your ex-spouse’s record if you were married at least 10 years. Understanding these rules and coordinating your claiming strategy with your divorce settlement is essential.

We address many of these considerations in “Gray Divorce: 5 Financial & Tax Considerations for Couples Over 50.

Coordinating the Bridge Strategy with Other Retirement Decisions

The bridge strategy doesn’t exist in isolation. It must coordinate with several other important retirement planning decisions.

Healthcare coverage before Medicare. If you retire before 65, you need healthcare coverage until Medicare begins. COBRA coverage from your former employer typically lasts 18 months. After that, you’ll need coverage from the ACA marketplace, a spouse’s plan, or private insurance. Factor these costs into your bridge period expenses.

Required Minimum Distributions. RMDs begin at age 73 for those born in 1951 or later. If you’re using the bridge strategy and reach RMD age before claiming Social Security, your required distributions might push you into higher tax brackets. Plan for this by modeling different scenarios or consider Roth conversions before RMDs begin.

Pension considerations. If you have a pension, understand how the claiming age affects your benefit and how it coordinates with Social Security. Some pensions reduce at certain ages assuming you’ll claim Social Security. Others offer different payout options that might influence your Social Security timing.

Part-time work. Some retirees work part-time during their 60s, either for income or personal fulfillment. If you earn above certain limits before full retirement age while claiming Social Security, your benefits will be reduced temporarily. This is another factor favoring delay. Once you reach full retirement age, earnings no longer affect benefits.

Spousal coordination. If you’re married, your claiming decisions should be coordinated. Often, the higher earner delays to 70 while the lower earner claims earlier. This provides some current income while maximizing the survivor benefit for whoever lives longer.

How to Implement a Bridge Strategy

If you’ve determined the bridge strategy makes sense for your situation, here’s how to implement it effectively.

Step 1: Model your specific situation. Use online calculators or work with a financial advisor to model claiming at different ages. Include your savings, expected returns, taxes, other income sources, and estimated longevity. The Social Security Administration’s website offers helpful tools, though they don’t account for taxes or other assets.

Step 2: Identify which accounts to draw from. Generally, draw from taxable accounts first, then traditional retirement accounts, saving Roth accounts for last. However, your situation might benefit from a different sequence. Tax planning during bridge years is critical.

Step 3: Consider Roth conversions. The bridge years offer a potential window for strategic Roth conversions. You’re already taking larger distributions and paying taxes. Converting additional amounts from traditional to Roth might make sense before Social Security income starts and potentially pushes you into higher brackets.

Step 4: Plan for sequence of returns risk. If you retire right before or during a market downturn, taking large withdrawals from declining accounts can be dangerous. Consider keeping 2-3 years of expenses in cash or short-term bonds to avoid selling stocks at depressed prices. Alternatively, have a plan to reduce spending or generate income if markets decline significantly.

Step 5: Review and adjust. Your bridge strategy isn’t set in stone. If your health changes, markets perform differently than expected, or tax laws change, you can adjust your claiming age. Up until the month you file for benefits, you can change your mind. Even after filing, you have a brief window to withdraw your application.

Step 6: File at the right time. Social Security benefits begin the month after you reach your target age. If you want benefits to start in January after turning 70, file in December. Applications can be filed up to four months before you want benefits to begin. Don’t miss your target date due to processing delays.

Special Considerations for Different Situations

Business Owners and Entrepreneurs

If you’ve sold your business or are planning an exit, the bridge strategy often makes excellent sense. Sale proceeds give you the liquid assets needed to fund the bridge period comfortably. The significantly higher Social Security benefit provides a guaranteed income floor that reduces pressure on your investment portfolio.

Many business owners are accustomed to controlling their income and may feel uncomfortable letting go of immediate Social Security income. However, think of delaying as making an investment with an 8% annual guaranteed return (the delayed retirement credit) that’s also inflation-adjusted and lasts for life. That’s a better return than most fixed income investments offer.

Divorced Individuals

Divorce complicates Social Security planning significantly. If you were married at least 10 years, you may be eligible for benefits based on your ex-spouse’s record. You can claim these benefits as early as 62, and your claiming doesn’t affect your ex-spouse’s benefits or their current spouse’s benefits.

The rules are complex. You can switch between your own benefit and an ex-spousal benefit at different times to maximize lifetime income. This requires careful planning, and a bridge strategy might apply to either or both benefits.

If you’re recently divorced and rebuilding financially, you may not have adequate assets for a bridge strategy. In this case, understanding which benefit to claim and when becomes even more critical. Consider consulting with a Social Security expert as part of your post-divorce financial planning.

Surviving Spouses

If your spouse has passed away and you’re deciding when to claim survivor benefits, the same general principles apply. Survivor benefits can begin as early as 60 (or 50 if you’re disabled), but they’re permanently reduced if claimed before your full retirement age.

You can claim a survivor benefit early and then switch to your own benefit later if it’s higher, or vice versa. This sequential claiming strategy can be valuable, but it requires understanding the complex rules around switching between benefit types.

The Role of Professional Guidance

Given the complexity of Social Security claiming decisions and their interaction with taxes, investments, healthcare, and other retirement income sources, professional guidance often pays for itself many times over.

A comprehensive financial advisor can model different scenarios specific to your situation, accounting for all relevant factors. They can show you the break-even ages, after-tax income, and total lifetime benefits under different claiming strategies.

They can also help you coordinate Social Security timing with Roth conversions, required minimum distributions, healthcare planning, and estate planning. All these pieces work together, and optimizing one without considering the others can lead to suboptimal outcomes.

At MJT & Associates, we take what we call a holistic approach to retirement planning. We don’t just look at Social Security in isolation. We consider how it fits with everything else in your financial life: your savings, your taxes, your estate plan, and your goals.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the break-even age for delaying Social Security benefits?

The break-even age is when the total benefits received from delaying equal the total from claiming early. For delaying from 62 to 70, break-even is typically around age 78 to 82, depending on your specific benefit amounts. However, this simple calculation ignores several important factors: taxes (Social Security is taxed more favorably), inflation protection (Social Security includes annual cost-of-living adjustments), survivor benefits (your spouse may collect for decades), and investment returns on your portfolio (the bridge strategy can actually preserve more wealth long-term). The true “break-even” analysis is more complex than it first appears.

Should I take Social Security at 62 and invest it for better returns?

This strategy sounds appealing but rarely works out mathematically. First, delayed retirement credits provide an 8% annual increase that’s guaranteed and inflation-adjusted, which is difficult to beat after-tax in fixed income investments. Second, taking benefits at 62 means a permanent 30% reduction that affects you for life, including cost-of-living adjustments on that lower base. Third, behavioral research shows that people who receive Social Security typically spend it rather than invest it. Finally, the tax treatment of Social Security income is more favorable than investment returns from taxable accounts. Unless you’re exceptionally disciplined and skilled at investing, delaying usually produces better outcomes.

How does the bridge strategy affect my spouse’s survivor benefits?

This is one of the bridge strategy’s most powerful advantages. When you die, your surviving spouse receives the higher of their own benefit or yours. By delaying to age 70 and maximizing your benefit, you ensure your spouse receives the highest possible survivor benefit for the rest of their life. If your spouse is younger or in better health than you, this could mean decades of higher income. For a couple where one person was the significantly higher earner, maximizing that person’s benefit through delayed claiming is often the single most important retirement planning decision they’ll make.

Can I change my mind after I start claiming Social Security?

You have limited opportunities to change your mind. Within 12 months of first claiming, you can withdraw your application, pay back all benefits received, and reapply later. This option is available only once in your lifetime. After 12 months, you cannot withdraw your application. However, if you’re at full retirement age or older, you can voluntarily suspend your benefits to earn delayed retirement credits, then restart them later at a higher amount. This doesn’t undo the reduction from claiming early, but it allows some correction. The best approach is to plan carefully before claiming to avoid needing these do-over provisions.

What if markets crash right after I retire and I’m using the bridge strategy?

This is a real risk called sequence of returns risk. If you retire at 62, plan to delay Social Security until 70, and markets drop 30% in year one, you’ll be withdrawing from a declining portfolio. To protect against this: maintain 2-3 years of expenses in cash or short-term bonds so you’re not forced to sell stocks at depressed prices, consider building flexibility into your spending plan so you can reduce withdrawals temporarily if markets decline severely, have a backup plan such as part-time work or accelerating your Social Security claim if absolutely necessary, or purchase an income annuity to guarantee a portion of your bridge income needs. A good financial plan accounts for this possibility and builds in protections rather than assuming markets will cooperate with your timeline.

Conclusion

The Social Security bridge strategy represents one of the most powerful retirement planning tools available, yet relatively few retirees use it. The emotional difficulty of watching savings decline during your 60s prevents many people from capturing hundreds of thousands of dollars in additional lifetime benefits.

The key to successful implementation is careful planning that accounts for your complete financial picture: your savings, your health, your tax situation, other income sources, and your goals. The bridge strategy isn’t right for everyone, but for those with adequate savings and reasonable health, it often provides the highest lifetime income.

At MJT & Associates, we help clients navigate this complex decision by modeling different scenarios, stress-testing assumptions, and integrating Social Security planning with Roth conversions, tax planning, and estate planning. We’ve seen firsthand how proper Social Security timing can add hundreds of thousands of dollars to a family’s wealth over retirement.

The decision of when to claim Social Security is too important to make based on gut feeling or general rules of thumb. Your situation deserves individual analysis that accounts for all relevant factors.

This article was originally published here and is republished on Wealthtender with permission.

About the Author

Headshot of Mitchell J. Thompson, CFP®, CDFA®, ChSNC®, AEP®
Mitchell J. Thompson, CFP®, CDFA®, ChSNC®, AEP® Family | Fixer | Fiduciary | Advisor | Wealth Manager

Mitchell J. Thompson, CFP®, CDFA®, ChSNC®, AEP® | MJT & Associates Financial Advisory Group

[With Exchange-Traded Fund (ETF) launches and innovation continuing at a rapid pace, communication, understanding, and insight are paramount to successfully creating and utilizing these cutting-edge products. There is a great industry need to share perspectives on identifying market and product trends, decoding regulatory updates, and exploring emerging and innovative portfolio strategies.

The recent Fall 2025 ETP Forum, developed by The Expert Series, and hosted by ETF Global in NYC, addressed the above industry needs by attracting a highly sophisticated financial audience of Asset Owners, Asset Managers, ETF issuers, Family Offices, Endowments, Foundations, Financial Advisors, and Wealth Management Professionals. They rigorously selected expert ETF speakers and panelists who provided deep-dive discussions and first-hand insights into trending ETF industry topics. It also offered a unique opportunity to network with leaders across the ETF industry.

As part of their expanded event format, the ETP Forum was designed to provide two ETF Tracks. An ETF Investor track presented by the issuers to connect with financial investors in their products and an ETF Industry track presented by industry leaders offering extremely valuable insights, learning, and new opportunities to consider in the ever-expanding world of ETFs. Hearing directly from product creators and industry leaders provided invaluable insights into ETF strategies, creating a transparent path to understanding these products more deeply.

The following provides highlights of some of the major sessions and discussions at the Fall 2025 ETP Forum.]

ETF Investor Track

Active Management in ETFs: Beyond the Wrapper – This panel discussion focused on the rapid growth and innovation within the actively managed ETF space. In 2022, there were just over 1,000 active ETFs with $330 billion in AUM, which has grown to over 2,500 products and $1.4 trillion in AUM. The growth in actively managed ETFs was described as a “perfect storm,” driven by a favorable regulatory landscape (specifically the “ETF Rule” 6c-11); sponsors’ adoption of the tax-efficient ETF structure; and growing client demand for differentiated investment products. The 6c-11 ETF Rule was a major catalyst, as it increased speed-to-market; mandated greater transparency; and allowed for custom baskets, which provided active managers with more flexibility in portfolio and tax management.

The panelists shared their firms’ unique approaches to active ETF management, covering strategies from leveraging in-house research and converting existing funds to partnering with external managers and focusing on niche investment securities. They also explored the expansion of active ETFs beyond traditional equity and fixed income into areas like private credit, digital assets, and enhanced income strategies. During the panel, it was discussed that active ETF assets could be at $4.2 trillion in AUM by 2030, representing 16% of total ETF assets compared to just 8% today.

The conversation concluded with a discussion on the importance of investor education and the future of product development, including how firms manage their ETF lineups and decide whether to close underperforming funds. All agreed that active ETFs will be a major area for growth and innovation in the ETF industry.

Options-Powered ETFs: The Derivative Renaissance – The panel discussion provided a comprehensive overview of the derivative-based ETF market, which has grown substantially in recent years, with a specific focus on option strategies. The panelists discussed the sector’s growth, attributing it to a search for alternatives to traditional fixed-income investments for income and hedging coming from the poor performance of 60/40 portfolios in 2022; demographic shifts looking for superior risk management and outcomes; and investor education changing the perception of derivatives from a “dirty word” associated with the financial crisis to a valuable tool for shaping portfolio risk and return profiles. They further explored the two main pillars of option ETFs: downside protection (buffered and hedged equity strategies) and income generation (covered calls, including zero-day options).

The conversation also covered the evolution from simple, systematic products to more active and sophisticated strategies; the critical importance of due diligence for advisors; and the operational innovations enabling this growth. Financial innovation – from new option contract types (e.g., FLEX options and zero-day-to-expiry [0DTE] contracts) to the ETF wrapper itself – is making sophisticated strategies that were once the domain of hedge funds accessible to a broader range of investors through ETFs.

The panelists concluded by identifying future tailwinds, including the growing conversion of mutual funds to ETFs; proactive partnerships with sophisticated asset managers (e.g., multi-strategy hedge funds) to bring their complex strategies to market in a liquid, accessible wrapper; and international expansion as the next major growth frontier for these products.

Defined Outcome ETFs: Structuring Certainty in Uncertain Markets – This was a panel discussion about the evolution, application, and future of defined outcome ETFs. The growth of the category from a single product in 2019 to over 400 ETFs representing roughly $70 billion in assets was offered as evidence of strong investor demand. The panelists explored the initial investor need that these products were created to solve – capital preservation and predictable risk management after a long bull market. They discussed how market infrastructure and innovation, particularly the liquidity of FLEX options, enabled their growth. Key topics included the use of these ETFs as a bond alternative; their role in core equity and alternatives sleeves; and common misconceptions regarding their complexity and liquidity.

The conversation also covered their performance during volatile periods, like 2020, 2022, and April 2025, citing lower standard deviation and high upside capture and the stable performance of defined outcome ETFs (in terms of spreads and premium/discounts) during the market volatility of April, as proof of their structural resilience. The panelists’ statements encouraged financial advisors to reconsider traditional portfolio construction, particularly the role of bonds or fixed-income. Their arguments for Defined Outcome ETFs as a “middle ground” solution could lead to increased adoption. 

They concluded with a look at the future of the space, which is expected to include the replication of structured products (e.g., auto-callable notes) in the more liquid and tax-efficient ETF wrapper, the growth of “laddered” ETFs to mitigate timing risk, and the expansion of defined outcome strategies into more volatile asset classes, like emerging markets and Bitcoin.

Crypto ETFs: Navigating the Next Phase of Digital Asset Access – The panel discussion focused on the rapidly evolving landscape of crypto ETFs. The panelists covered the foundational structures of crypto products (33 Act vs. 40 Act funds), contrasted the ETF wrapper with alternative vehicles like Digital Asset Treasuries (DATs), the critical integration of features like staking to enhance returns, and the impact of new generic listing standards that accelerated the launch of new products.

A central theme of the discussion was the market’s maturation from a focus on simple access to a demand for more strategic allocation decisions and portfolio-building tools, underpinned by an increasingly accommodating regulatory environment and the need for robust investor education. The panelists identified the next wave of innovation as being more complex crypto ETF products, including leveraged funds, inverse funds, defined outcome strategies, and diversified index funds.

ETF Industry Track

ETF Legal & Share Class Structures: A Regulatory Crossroads – The panel discussion covered several key trends and operational issues in the Exchange Traded Products (ETP) industry. The panelists began by analyzing the operational and strategic challenges of adding ETF share classes to mutual funds, including communication hurdles between intermediaries and transfer agents; distribution challenges and strategies; and tax implications. The conversation then shifted to a comparison of US and European markets, particularly in the areas of crypto ETPs and leveraged products, where Europe was noted to have a more developed crypto market. The panel also explored the mechanics, benefits, and significant risks of tax-deferred 351 exchanges, including the failure of diversification or 80% ownership tests, which could blow the tax-free status for all participants. Finally, they discussed liquidity concerns with private credit ETFs; the impact of new regulations like the Names Rule and tailored shareholder reports; and the management of VC/PE funds.

The panelists repeatedly emphasized that new product structures, such as ETF share classes and 351 exchanges, introduced significant operational and workflow challenges that required careful planning and system development, which would most probably temper a rush of new activity in these areas. The stark warnings about the legal and tax risks of improperly executed 351 exchanges could serve as a crucial caution for advisors and investors considering this strategy. Furthermore, the insights into Europe’s more mature crypto and leveraged ETP markets could help US market participants anticipate future product development and potential regulatory responses.

Distribution in the ETF Era: Getting on the Radar – This was a panel discussion focused on the critical challenges and strategies for successfully distributing ETFs in a crowded market of over 4,400 products. The panelists discussed that the success of an ETF depended less on the wrapper itself and more on traditional factors like performance, fees, and a robust distribution strategy.

Key topics included the immense difficulty and cost of gaining platform accessibility; the necessity of having an active sales force (“boots on the ground”); the challenge of properly incentivizing sales teams to sell new products; and the question of whether there were any strategic differences in distribution compared to mutual funds. The conversation provided a realistic overview of the financial and logistical hurdles new and existing issuers faced when bringing ETFs to market.

It was contended that distribution structures for ETFs were not substantively different from those for mutual funds, with research showing that the success and failure rates of new products were comparable across both wrappers and that distribution challenges were similarPanelists repeatedly returned to the idea that an ETF wrapper was not a magic bullet and that active, strategic distribution was paramount to gathering assets.

A View from the Exchanges: ETF Innovation at the Infrastructure Level – This was a panel discussion featuring representatives from Nasdaq and CBOE. The conversation centered on the evolving ETF landscape and the role of exchanges. Key topics included the emergence of new listing venues like the Texas Stock Exchange; the highly anticipated approval of ETF share classes for mutual funds; and the operational support exchanges provided for new and existing issuers. The panelists detailed recent market structure enhancements, such as new processes for market-on-open and discussed their preparations for potential 24/5 trading. They also covered investor protection mechanisms, market maker incentive programs, and the adoption of new technologies like AI and tokenization to innovate and improve market surveillance. The discussion concluded with thoughts on future market complexities and the role of ETFs in volatile environments.

The statements made reassured the audience, particularly ETF issuers and investors, that the major exchanges were proactively addressing the industry’s biggest challenges. Their detailed plans for enhancing market-on-open procedures, preparing for 24/5 trading, and improving market maker incentives demonstrated a commitment to maintaining orderly markets amidst rapid growth and innovation. Discussions on tokenization could signal to the market that traditional finance entities were seriously integrating blockchain technology, potentially accelerating its adoption.

Custodians in the Spotlight: Enabling Scale and Stability – The panelists provided a behind-the-scenes look at the critical role of service providers in the ETF ecosystem, emphasizing how their capabilities directly impacted trading costs, tax efficiency, and risk mitigation for funds. They covered the challenges and operational requirements of launching complex products involving options, derivatives, and cryptocurrencies. Key themes included the necessity of early and frequent communication between issuers and service providers; the importance of a deep operational bench for rapid problem resolution; and the strain on the entire industry’s infrastructure due to the high volume of new and innovative product launches. The discussion also touched on emerging trends like crypto ETFs with staking; the potential for ETF share classes; and the race to market for novel products.

The discussion had a significant impact on the audience of ETF issuers and prospective issuers. It underscored that launching an ETF, particularly a complex one, is not just about a good idea but also about selecting partners with deep, proven operational expertise. The conversation served as a practical guide to the due diligence issues that should be performed on service providers and highlighted the importance of treating them as strategic partners rather than just vendors. It may have tempered expectations about launch timelines while reinforcing the need for robust internal and external operational teams.

Trading ETFs: Liquidity, Execution, and Market Efficiency – The panel discussion focused on the evolution of ETF trading efficiency and explored the key drivers of this efficiency. They began by deconstructing the components of an ETF spread, emphasizing the costs of the underlying basket, operational fees, and the pricing of active management risk. A central theme was the critical importance of communication and “partnership” between ETF issuers and market makers for maintaining tight spreads and healthy liquidity. The conversation then shifted to the structural changes in the market, particularly how mutual fund-to-ETF conversions have altered the typical growth and trading profiles of new funds, creating new challenges for market makers.

Finally, the panel addressed the strain on the ecosystem caused by the sheer volume of new ETF launches, which has thinned competition and increased the need for specialized execution solutions to access liquidity effectively. The discussion concluded with an audience question about the role of technology and AI, with panelists affirming that while automation is crucial for efficiency, the human element of communication and relationships remains indispensable in a complex market.

The panelists’ statements served as a practical guide and a warning for participants in the ETF market. For new and existing ETF issuers, the discussion highlighted that a successful launch requires more than a good idea; it demands a sophisticated capital markets strategy and deep, symbiotic relationships with market makers. For advisors and investors, the conversation underscored that best execution is becoming more complex and that not all ETF liquidity is apparent on screen. The insights could prompt asset managers to invest more heavily in dedicated capital markets talent or outsourced solutions to navigate this increasingly competitive environment.

UCITS & Global ETFs: Bridging Borders, Expanding Access – This was a panel discussion focused on the European ETF market, specifically for an audience of North American asset managers considering an expansion into the European market. The panelists, representing legal, portfolio management, indexing, and platform solutions experts, discussed the key similarities and differences between the US and European ETF landscapes. Major topics included the regulatory environment for active ETFs in Europe (particularly in Ireland); the various strategies for market entry; the fragmented nature of European distribution; and emerging product trends like options-based strategies and the growth of retail savings plans in Germany.

The conversation emphasized that while Europe presented a significant growth opportunity, they strongly positioned the white-label platform model as the most pragmatic entry strategy, potentially steering firms away from more costly and time-consuming “build” or “buy” approaches. The detailed discussion on the fragmentation of the European market and the critical need for local distribution expertise served as a crucial piece of advice, helping firms avoid common pitfalls and structure their European expansion more effectively.

Final Thoughts

ETF Global’s Fall 2025 ETP Forum was designed to provide a dynamic event to explore and address the unfolding benefits, challenges, issues, and dynamics of the fast-evolving ETF universe. It successfully created a comprehensive agenda of leading ETF industry topics and a vibrant atmosphere of learning and exchanging ideas by marrying the leading voices in Exchange-Traded Funds with an audience of sophisticated financial professionals eager to engage these experts.

The conversations took place against the backdrop of a booming ETF industry characterized by intense product innovation. The detailed information and insights shared can significantly influence ETF issuers, financial investors, and industry leaders. It was also good to hear the collective warnings from the panelists on the specific challenges ahead for the industry; the need for thorough due diligence; and a “client-first” approach to product development that should accompany rapid innovation in the financial industry.

The next ETF Global semi-annual ETP Forum will be on June 2, 2026 in New York City.

This article was originally published here and is republished on Wealthtender with permission.

About the Author

A middle-aged man, Bill Hortz, with short dark hair wearing a dark pinstripe suit, white dress shirt, and a maroon tie, posing against a plain gray backdrop. He has a slight smile and is looking directly at the camera.

Bill Hortz

Founder Institute for Innovation Development

Bill Hortz is an independent business consultant and Founder/Dean of the Institute for Innovation Development- a financial services business innovation platform and network. With over 30 years of experience in the financial services industry including expertise in sales/marketing/branding of asset management firms, as well as, creatively restructuring and developing internal/external sales and strategic account departments for 5 major financial firms, including OppenheimerFunds, Neuberger&Berman and Templeton Funds Distributors. His wide ranging experiences have led Bill to a strong belief, passion and advocation for strategic thinking, innovation creation and strategic account management as the nexus of business skills needed to address a business environment challenged by an accelerating rate of change.

If you’re charitably inclined and have investments in a taxable brokerage account, you might be leaving significant tax savings on the table. Most people automatically reach for their checkbook or credit card when making charitable donations, but there’s a more tax-efficient strategy that could save you thousands of dollars over time.

The solution? Donate appreciated stock instead of cash.

This strategy isn’t complicated, but it’s surprisingly underutilized. Let’s walk through exactly how it works and why it might be one of the smartest moves you can make for both your favorite causes and your long-term financial health.

The Problem with Cash Donations

There’s nothing wrong with donating cash to charities you support. You’re making an impact, and if you itemize deductions, you get a tax benefit. That’s a win-win.

But here’s what most people don’t realize: when you donate cash, you’re missing an opportunity to eliminate capital gains taxes on appreciated investments in your taxable brokerage account.

If you have stocks, ETFs, or mutual funds sitting in a brokerage account that have increased in value, you’re eventually going to pay capital gains taxes when you sell those investments. Whether you’re selling them for income in retirement or just rebalancing your portfolio, the IRS will want its cut of your gains.

Unless you donate those securities to charity instead.

Note: whenever the term “stock” is used, we will assume it means “stocks, ETFs, mutual funds, or some other type of security.”

How Donating Stock Works

The strategy is straightforward, though it requires a few extra steps compared to writing a check.

Let’s say you’re planning to donate $5,000 to your Donor Advised Fund. You’ll eventually grant that money to charities you support, but for now, you’re making the contribution to the DAF.

You also have a batch of stock in your brokerage account that you originally purchased for $3,000, and it’s now worth $5,000.

If you were to sell that stock to free up cash, you’d owe capital gains tax on the $2,000 gain. At the 15% federal capital gains rate (the bracket many middle-to-upper-income earners fall into), that’s $300 in taxes.

Here’s the better approach: donate the stock directly from your brokerage account to your Donor Advised Fund instead of donating cash.

The Tax Magic Happens Here

When you donate appreciated securities that you’ve held for more than one year, you avoid paying capital gains tax on the appreciation entirely. The charity receives the full $5,000 value, and you get to deduct the full $5,000 on your tax return (assuming you itemize and the donation is under 30% of your adjusted gross income).

But the benefits don’t stop there.

After you’ve donated the stock, transfer $5,000 in cash from your bank account to your brokerage account. Use that cash to buy new shares of the same stock you just donated.

You’ve essentially replaced the stock you gave away. Your portfolio looks the same. But something important has changed.

Resetting Your Cost Basis

This is where the long-term tax savings really add up.

Your old cost basis on that stock was $3,000. Your new cost basis is $5,000, because that’s what you paid when you repurchased the shares.

You’ve effectively wiped out $2,000 in capital gains that would have been taxable down the road.

Let’s fast-forward to see how this plays out over time.

The Long-Term Impact

Imagine you hold onto that stock for several more years, and it grows to $10,000 in value. You’re now ready to sell it to generate income, perhaps in retirement.

If you had kept the original stock with the $3,000 cost basis and never donated it, you’d owe capital gains tax on $7,000 of growth ($10,000 current value minus $3,000 original purchase price). At 15%, that’s $1,050 in taxes.

But if you had donated the original stock and reset your basis to $5,000, you’d only owe tax on $5,000 of growth ($10,000 current value minus $5,000 new cost basis). That’s $750 in taxes.

You just saved $300 in capital gains taxes, simply by taking a few extra steps when you made your charitable donation.

Multiply This Over Time

Now think about this strategy applied consistently over many years, across multiple donations, and with different positions in your portfolio.

If you donate $10,000 annually using appreciated stock, and each donation resets $3,000 to $5,000 in embedded gains, you’re eliminating $30,000 to $50,000 in taxable gains every decade.

At a 15% capital gains rate, that’s $4,500 to $7,500 in tax savings over ten years, just from being strategic about how you make charitable contributions you were going to make anyway.

The tax savings become even more significant if you’re in the 20% capital gains bracket (which kicks in at higher income levels) or if you’re also subject to the 3.8% Net Investment Income Tax.

You Still Get the Full Tax Deduction

Here’s what makes this strategy so powerful: you’re not sacrificing anything on the charitable deduction side.

You still get to deduct the full fair market value of the donated stock, assuming you itemize deductions and your donation is within the 30% of AGI limit for appreciated securities. This is the same deduction you would have received if you’d donated cash.

So you get the charitable deduction plus the elimination of capital gains taxes. It’s a double tax benefit.

How Donor Advised Funds Make This Easy

Donor Advised Fund is the ideal vehicle for implementing this strategy. Here’s why it works so well.

When you donate stock to your DAF, the fund sells the securities with no capital gains tax liability (because it’s a charitable entity). The proceeds then sit in your DAF account, where you can invest them and let them grow tax-free until you’re ready to grant the funds to specific charities.

This gives you flexibility. You can make one large donation of appreciated stock to your DAF, reset the basis on multiple positions, and then distribute grants to various charities over time as you see fit.

Most major DAF sponsors make it relatively easy to donate securities. You’ll typically need to fill out a stock transfer form and provide your brokerage account information, but the process is well-established.

What Qualifies as Appreciated Stock

For this strategy to work optimally, you need securities that meet certain criteria.

First, you must have held the securities for more than one year. Short-term capital gains (on assets held for one year or less) don’t receive the same preferential tax treatment, so the tax benefit is diminished.

Second, the securities should have appreciated in value. If you have positions that are underwater (worth less than what you paid), this strategy doesn’t apply. In fact, it would be better to sell those at a loss to harvest the tax loss, then donate cash.

Third, the securities should be in a taxable brokerage account, not in a retirement account like an IRA or 401(k). The tax rules for donating from retirement accounts are completely different.

Which Securities Should You Donate?

If you have multiple positions with embedded gains, which should you donate first?

Generally, you want to donate the securities with the largest unrealized capital gains relative to their current value. These are the positions where you’ll get the biggest benefit from avoiding capital gains taxes.

For example, if you have a stock that’s doubled in value (100% gain) and another that’s increased by 20%, donate the one with the 100% gain first. You’re eliminating a much larger tax liability.

Also consider your overall portfolio strategy. If you’re planning to reduce your position in a particular holding anyway, donating some of it to charity while simultaneously rebalancing can be very efficient.

The Step-by-Step Process

Let’s recap the exact steps to implement this strategy.

Identify the amount you want to donate and confirm you have appreciated securities in your taxable brokerage account that you’ve held for over a year.

Contact your Donor Advised Fund provider and initiate a stock transfer. You’ll need to provide information about which securities you’re donating and how many shares.

Coordinate with your brokerage firm to transfer the securities to the DAF. Your brokerage and the DAF sponsor can walk you through the specific transfer process.

Once the stock has been donated, transfer an equivalent amount of cash from your bank account to your brokerage account.

Use that cash to repurchase the same securities you just donated, effectively replacing what you gave away.

The DAF will sell the donated securities, and the proceeds will be available in your DAF account for future grants to charities. You maintain the same portfolio allocation you had before, but with a higher cost basis on the securities you repurchased.

Tax Reporting Considerations

When tax time comes, you’ll need to report the donation on your tax return if you’re itemizing deductions.

You’ll receive a receipt from your Donor Advised Fund showing the fair market value of the securities on the date they were transferred. This is the amount you can deduct.

If you donate more than $5,000 in securities, you’ll need to file Form 8283 with your tax return and may need a qualified appraisal. Your tax advisor can guide you through these requirements.

Keep good records of the original purchase price and date for the securities you donated, as well as the new purchase price and date for the replacement securities. This documentation will be important when you eventually sell the new shares.

Limitations and Considerations

While this strategy is powerful, there are some limitations to keep in mind.

The 30% of AGI limitation on deductions for appreciated property can be restrictive if you’re making very large donations relative to your income. Cash contributions have a higher 60% of AGI limit. However, you can carry forward unused deductions for up to five years, so this may not be a significant obstacle.

Transaction costs and timing can be a minor consideration. There may be a few days between when you donate securities and when you can repurchase them, during which time the price could move. For most long-term investors, this short-term fluctuation is insignificant compared to the tax savings.

This strategy works best for people who itemize deductions. If you take the standard deduction, the charitable deduction itself provides no tax benefit (though you still avoid capital gains taxes by donating appreciated securities).

Who Benefits Most from This Strategy

This approach is particularly valuable for certain types of investors.

If you have a concentrated position in a stock that has appreciated significantly (perhaps company stock from an employer), donating portions of it over time while resetting your basis can be an excellent way to both reduce concentration risk and support causes you care about.

Early retirees who are in low-income years before Social Security and required minimum distributions begin might be in the 0% capital gains bracket currently. In these cases, you might actually sell appreciated securities, pay no tax, donate the cash, and repurchase the securities to reset the basis. This is a slightly different approach but uses the same concept of basis management.

In general, it’s potentially valuable for anyone who makes significant charitable contributions each year, itemizes deductions, and has appreciated stock in a taxable brokerage account.

Making This a Regular Practice

The real power of this strategy emerges when you make it a consistent part of your financial planning rather than a one-time tactic.

If charitable giving is already part of your financial plan, simply shift to a default approach of donating appreciated securities rather than cash. Over decades, the tax savings can be substantial.

Identify which positions in your portfolio have the largest embedded gains (or work with your financial advisor to determine this). Make those your primary funding source for charitable contributions.

Consider “bunching” donations by making several years’ worth of contributions to your Donor Advised Fund in a single year when you have a high-income year or large embedded gains you want to eliminate.

The Bottom Line

Donating cash to charity is good. Donating appreciated stock to charity can be even better.

By taking a few extra steps to donate securities instead of cash, you accomplish three important goals. You support causes you care about, you get the same charitable tax deduction you would have received for a cash donation, and you permanently eliminate capital gains taxes on the appreciated portion of your investment.

For charitably inclined investors with taxable brokerage accounts, this is one of the most effective tax-planning strategies available. It costs you nothing in terms of the actual donation amount, requires only modest additional effort, and can save thousands of dollars in taxes over time.

If you’re planning to make charitable contributions this year and have appreciated securities in a brokerage account, talk to your financial advisor about implementing this strategy. The tax savings are too significant to ignore.

This article was originally published here and is republished on Wealthtender with permission.

About the Author

Headshot of Michael Reynolds, CFP®, CSRIC®, AIF®, CFT-I™
Michael Reynolds, CFP®, CSRIC®, AIF®, CFT-I™ Progressive Financial Planning & SRI/ESG Investing.

Michael Reynolds, CFP®, CSRIC®, AIF®, CFT-I™ | Elevation Financial

Split image of a woman smiling with arms crossed standing in front of a window and a man with arms crossed wearing a light blazer, standing against a wooden wall.
Era Jain, Co-Founder & CEO, and Divam Jain, Co-Founder & CTO, Zeplyn | Image Credit: Institute for Innovation Development

[Wealth management firms have been sitting on valuable client data for decades because there has not been an efficient way to bring it together and strategically put it to use to guide firm actions and better serve clients. Now with Agentic AI technology, financial firms can turn their inherent business knowledge – meeting notes, CRM records, emails, client documents, conversations, and other engagement signals – into complete, trusted business intelligence and quickly convert it into coordinated, end-to-end execution.

A new generation of agentic AI platforms is moving the industry beyond simple automation and into a world where systems do not just surface insights – they execute work. At the forefront of this shift is Zeplyn, an AI-native workflow intelligence platform purpose-built for wealth management firms.

Founded by former Google engineers Era Jain, Co-Founder & CEO, and Divam Jain, Co-Founder & CTO, Zeplyn recently introduced Zeplyn Agent Nexus – a context-aware research and execution engine designed to help firms finally turn fragmented client intelligence into finished work at scale.

We spoke with the founders about why Zeplyn Agent Nexus represents a turning point for the industry, and how agentic AI is redefining growth, capacity, and personalization in wealth management.]

Hortz: How does Zeplyn Agent Nexus represent a major evolution in how wealth management firms use AI?

Divam Jain: The first wave of AI in wealth management was largely observational. It summarized meetings and surfaced insights after the fact. It was helpful, but passive.

Zeplyn Agent Nexus represents a shift from knowing to doing. Instead of telling a wealth manager that a client mentioned an asset sale, Zeplyn can draft the personalized outreach, update the CRM workflow, and handle the follow-up, end-to-end. That distinction is subtle, yet profound.

Era Jain: We learned early on that about 60% of meaningful client data is shared in meetings, yet historically less than 25% ever made it into structured systems. Once we solved for capture and accuracy, the real opportunity became clear: intelligence only creates value when it’s activated.

Through our Ask Zeplyn functionality powered by Agent Nexus, for example, wealth managers can now ask complex, real-world questions and immediately request action. That is the leap from AI as a reporting tool to AI as an execution engine, and we are going to start seeing more of this across the entire industry.

Hortz: Can you give an example of how that plays out in practice?

Era Jain: A wealth manager might ask: “Identify clients from last month’s meetings who mentioned an asset sale but haven’t received an estate-planning follow-up.”

Zeplyn Agent Nexus evaluates meeting notes, cross-references CRM data, reviews email history, builds the client list, and drafts personalized outreach that is ready for wealth manager review.

That entire workflow used to take hours across multiple systems. Wealth managers routinely tell us that follow-ups alone can consume nearly 30% of their workweek. Agentic AI compresses that into minutes without sacrificing personalization or control.

Hortz: How exactly does a system of specialized AI agents take dispersed data from across the firm and turn it into fully executed actions? How does this structurally happen?

Divam Jain: Agentic systems are fundamentally different from traditional AI tools. At the core is an orchestration layer. When a complex request comes in, the system breaks it down into sub-tasks and assigns them to specialized agents.

One agent may query the CRM. Another evaluates meeting transcripts. Another handles tone-matching and compliance-aware drafting. The orchestration layer determines which agents are needed, what data they can access, and in what sequence.

The hardest part is context engineering, ensuring each agent has enough information to be accurate, but not so much noise that the results degrade or hallucinate. That is where guardrails and domain specificity matter.

Era Jain: This is not something you can build as a general-purpose tool. Wealth management workflows are nuanced. You need to understand how wealth managers talk about sensitive topics, how firms differ in style, and how compliance fits into every step. That industry intelligence is embedded directly into Zeplyn Agent Nexus.

Hortz: With a lack of trust often being the biggest barrier to AI adoption, how do you balance automation with wealth manager oversight?

Era Jain: We are firm believers in human-in-the-loop design. Zeplyn Agent Nexus does not act autonomously; it acts on instruction.

Wealth managers initiate requests through Ask Zeplyn. The agents handle the heavy lifting by breaking down tasks, gathering data, and drafting outputs, while the wealth manager always reviews and approves the final result. This is accelerated execution, not delegated authority.

Divam Jain: One thing we heard consistently from firms was, “I want it done my way.” That became a design principle for us. Wealth management firms do not just want AI outputs they can tweak; they want systems that are built to reflect how their firm operates.

With Zeplyn, we work directly with firms to configure the system itself – how information is structured, how workflows run, and how outputs are generated – so the AI aligns with the firm’s preferred language, processes, and standards. Then, at the individual level, wealth managers can still review, edit, and refine every output before it is finalized.

That combination is what builds trust. The AI is not imposing a generic model of “how advice should look.” It is operating inside the firm’s own model and acting like a skilled chief of staff who already understands how things are done.

Hortz: Beyond individual productivity, how does agentic AI become a growth engine at the firm level?

Era Jain: Growth in wealth management has always been constrained by capacity. Personalization traditionally does not scale.

When you save wealth managers 50–60% of the time they spend on admin, you dramatically expand their capacity to deepen relationships and pursue new opportunities. At the same time, the system ensures no opportunity falls through the cracks. Firms can surface “silent” opportunities, such as clients who experienced a life event but have not been engaged in months, and can now act proactively.

Divam Jain: At the enterprise level, Zeplyn Agent Nexus becomes a learning system. Leaders can analyze successful wealth manager behaviors, extract patterns, and turn them into playbooks for the rest of the firm.

You can ask the system to review recent high-performing discovery meetings and generate a best-practice guide for junior wealth managers. That is how firms scale institutional wisdom.

Hortz: As former Google engineers, what advice do you have for firms adopting agentic AI?

Era Jain: First, data integrity matters. AI is only as powerful as the data it can access. Firms should ensure that their CRM and meeting notes are being captured consistently. That is the engine’s fuel.

Second, the best way to implement this is to use it as a stress test. Do not just use it for the easy stuff. Push the system to handle complex queries and unique use cases. The more your team interacts with the AI, the more they trust it, and the more “agentic” your firm becomes.

Divam Jain: It is also important to shift your mindset around what agentic AI is. One of the biggest mistakes firms make is treating it like another piece of software. This is not about adding a tool to an existing workflow. It’s about rethinking how work gets done, about redesigning workflows so decisions and execution happen closer together.

This article was originally published here and is republished on Wealthtender with permission.

About the Author

A middle-aged man, Bill Hortz, with short dark hair wearing a dark pinstripe suit, white dress shirt, and a maroon tie, posing against a plain gray backdrop. He has a slight smile and is looking directly at the camera.

Bill Hortz

Founder Institute for Innovation Development

Bill Hortz is an independent business consultant and Founder/Dean of the Institute for Innovation Development- a financial services business innovation platform and network. With over 30 years of experience in the financial services industry including expertise in sales/marketing/branding of asset management firms, as well as, creatively restructuring and developing internal/external sales and strategic account departments for 5 major financial firms, including OppenheimerFunds, Neuberger&Berman and Templeton Funds Distributors. His wide ranging experiences have led Bill to a strong belief, passion and advocation for strategic thinking, innovation creation and strategic account management as the nexus of business skills needed to address a business environment challenged by an accelerating rate of change.